Hacking God

The Biggest Identity Theft Ever

Last year about this time, I was a victim of identity theft. Someone got hold of my Social Security number and other vital information through the “dark web,” and over the course of a day or two purchased two luxury automobiles at my expense.

Fortunately, a banker in Ohio suspected the worst and contacted me. At first, I wasn’t sure he was a banker at all, and I wondered if he was someone phishing for information himself. But a quick check of my credit report confirmed the unwelcome truth. I was in hock for about $170,000 of charges in my name. I set to work immediately, and because this happens a lot in our super-connected world, policies are in place that made it possible for me to have those charges reversed over the course of a week. Unfortunately, the car dealerships had to reclassify the sales as thefts, and as far as I know, the criminal who stole my identity, and those cars, is still on the lam.

Identity theft has been around from the beginning, but in the brave new world made possible by technology, our illusions have grown increasingly credible. Recently the pop musician Taylor Swift was the victim of a “deep fake” in which her likeness was used in a pornographic video. A deep fake—if you haven’t heard—is a computer-generated simulation of a real person. Taylor Swift wasn’t in the video, but a naïve viewer wouldn’t know that.

Imagine what the Ministry of Truth could have done with technology like this. Speaking of dystopian literature, consider the dystopian turn Western culture has taken with respect to “identity politics.” Technology is employed here as well. People are scouring their DNA for evidence that they belong to a historically aggrieved group, such now conferring status and permitting access to set-asides and preferential treatment. Or consider the surreal world of so-called gender-affirming care. Now, with a few snips and some hormones, men can pass as women while retaining the physical advantages of men. Not only do some of them win prizes that were set aside for women, but they also enjoy the advantage of belonging to another supposedly disfavored group, in this case something called “trans.”

If this comes as a surprise, it shouldn’t. Socrates in The Republic observed, “What is honored in a country is practiced there.” And today we not only honor aggrieved groups, but we also favor anyone attempting to “transcend” the limits of biology.

You probably noticed an inconsistency here. In the first case, something real—the composition of one’s DNA—is revealed with technology, but in the second, the presence of a Y chromosome is covered up with technology. Which goes to show reality isn’t always the point. Since that’s so, what is the point?

The Ship of Theseus

The “Ship of Theseus” thought experiment might be helpful for homing in on what’s going on. Here’s a brief summary: There was once a ship named “The Ship of Theseus,” and over time it underwent repair, one part after another being replaced until the entire ship was made up of new parts—new rudder, new sails, new masts, even new planking and a new hull. The question is, after everything has been replaced, is it the same ship, or not?

Most people would say, “Of course!” although many would struggle to explain why. Some might say that it boils down to the name—the name remains even though the ship is different. But if that’s all there is to it, why not play with the names?

There’s one obvious problem with that, for a time anyway, and that’s confusion. Two or more names might jostle with each other, and the identity of the ship wouldn’t be clear. Of course, if you had the power, you could ruthlessly cancel people who didn’t use the new name, until everyone was either reeducated or eliminated. Speaking of names, let’s call this the “What’s in a name?” view of identity—or we can just call it “nominalism.” In essence, nominalists don’t believe there is anything essential behind a name. And when it comes to identity theft, it isn’t clear how a nominalist approach could help clear things up.

To many healthy-minded people, nominalism doesn’t seem quite right. So perhaps it’s the design of the ship that matters? In that case, new parts replacing old ones doesn’t alter the design; that remains essentially unchanged. This gives us a basis for a name. The name helps us identify something essential. Let’s call this the “Name the purpose” school of thought, or we can just call it “Aristotelianism.”


We can take this to another level by asking, “Where did the purpose come from?” Is there a formal cause somewhere? And if so, where? Historically, this has taken both impersonal and personal forms. Plato posited an eternal realm of changeless ideas. (Mathematics, for example—most professional mathematicians are Platonists.) On the other hand, Theists who believe in a personal God proposed that the mind of God is the “still spot” where ideas exist unchangingly. Either way, identity can’t be lost because essences come before things. So even if the Ship of Theseus is just a name to us, it’s more than that. We can call this the “really real” view, or just “realism.”

The Problem of Identity Politics

Identity politics demonstrates that this isn’t just an academic exercise. There are practical consequences to how the puzzle of identity is solved. And it’s not a coincidence that technology lies behind the Ship of Theseus problem. In our time, when the line separating technology from nature has gotten blurry, the puzzle appears to be more challenging than ever to solve.

The image of the natural world we now entertain is that of an amoral, happenstance machine, without design or purpose. Even our bodies—“meat machines,” as Marvin Minsky put it—don’t evince intelligence. Instead, they’re just accidents of nature. If there is any intelligence involved in them, it’s our own—our purposes, our designs—that matter.

C. S. Lewis saw the trend lines in 1948, I believe—long before the technologies we now take for granted were even imaginable. In That Hideous Strength, he ruminates on the modern image of the cosmos and what it has come to mean for scientists:

The physical sciences, good and innocent in themselves, had already, even in Ransom’s own time, begun to be warped, had been subtly maneuvered in a certain direction. Despair of objective truth had been increasingly insinuated into the scientists; indifference to it, and a concentration upon mere power, had been the result. . . . Dreams of the far future destiny of man were dragging up from its shallow and unquiet grave the old dream of Man as God. . . . What should they find incredible, since they believed no longer in a rational universe?

One might be forgiven for thinking he overstated the problem if there were not so much evidence that this is just what is happening. Take, for example, Yuval Noah Harari, adviser to the World Economic Forum and author of—what else?—Homo Deus (a book with over 35,000 ratings on Amazon), who writes: “Humans are now hackable animals. The whole idea that humans have this ‘soul’ or ‘spirit,’ and nobody knows what’s happening inside them and they have free-will—that’s over.” On the face of it, that doesn’t sound like humans are dreaming about godhood, but what about the hackers? They indeed are. And this is just the point, as Lewis said more than once; what man becoming God really boils down to is some people assuming the place of God in the lives of other people.

And the hacking doesn’t stop there. The hackers are hacking themselves. The goal is to transcend human limits. Take senescence: it isn’t a curse; it’s an engineering problem. Ultimately the engineers will replace old defective parts with new and improved ones, more lasting and presumably infinitely upgradeable. As Lewis said, it’s an old story, but with a new twist: silicon man as God.

Let’s say, for the sake of argument, that even though immortality will forever be out of reach, a significant extension of our lifespans may not be. Perhaps the transhumanists can give Methuselah a run for his money. What would our silicon overlords do with the obsolete carbon-based creatures they’ve left behind? Certainly, they will be unimaginably wealthy and powerful. But will they still be human?

Something Real Behind the Name

This has me thinking of the sin of taking the Lord’s name in vain. Generally, that sin is applied to condemnatory and expostulatory uses of the divine name, but I think it must also include arrogating the name to oneself, claiming God’s prerogatives, as in identity theft, the original sin. God isn’t a word without a referent. Plato’s Forms prevail in the long run, but only impersonally, because they’re not persons (at least as they were originally understood). But God, well, he is a Person—actually, three Persons—and he takes identity theft personally.

If Scripture is any indication, he won’t take this sitting down. He’ll come down to see what the transhumanists are up to. And when he does, there will be hell to pay.

C. R. Wiley is a pastor and writer living in the Pacific Northwest. He has written for many publications, his favorite being Touchstone. His most recent book, In the House of Tom Bombadil, is available from Canon Press. He is a senior editor of Touchstone.

Print &
Online Subscription

Get six issues (one year) of Touchstone PLUS full online access including pdf downloads for only $39.95. That's only $3.34 per month!

Online
Subscription

Get a one-year full-access subscription to the Touchstone online archives for only $19.95. That's only $1.66 per month!

bulk subscriptions

Order Touchstone subscriptions in bulk and save $10 per sub! Each subscription includes 6 issues of Touchstone plus full online access to touchstonemag.com—including archives, videos, and pdf downloads of recent issues for only $29.95 each! Great for churches or study groups.

Transactions will be processed on a secure server.


more on culture from the online archives

20.8—October 2007

Aliens in Zion

on Why I Can’t Be Just Another Earthman by Louis Markos

32.6—November/December 2019

Listening Up

Historical Truth, Beguiling Stories & Three Kinds of Hearers by Anthony Esolen

34.1—January/February 2021

Fighting for Love

What the World Needs Now It Hardly Knows by Anthony Esolen


more from the online archives

18.2—March 2005

Long Shadows of Eden

On Conservatism as Vexation, Vanity & Near Impossibility by Graeme Hunter

35.4—Jul/Aug 2022

The Death Rattle of a Tradition

Contemporary Catholic Thinking on the Question of War by Andrew Latham

32.4—July/August 2019

Sojourner Knight

on Single-Mindedness in Durer's Ritter, Tod, und Teufel by Anthony Costello

calling all readers

Please Donate

"There are magazines worth reading but few worth saving . . . Touchstone is just such a magazine."
—Alice von Hildebrand

"Here we do not concede one square millimeter of territory to falsehood, folly, contemporary sentimentality, or fashion. We speak the truth, and let God be our judge. . . . Touchstone is the one committedly Christian conservative journal."
—Anthony Esolen, Touchstone senior editor

Support Touchstone

00