Why Liberals Are Smarter
In an earlier contribution to Mortal Remains titled, "Alas, Average at Best" (July/August 2020), I had occasion to note, in a story documenting the impending liberal/conservative division of the United Methodist Church on homosexuality, some journalist's observation that the liberal faction was the brighter one, conservatives invariably being less educated, accomplished, and culturally sophisticated. The implication, I wrote,
is that those in the churches who oppose what used to be universally acknowledged in them as sexual sin are, on the whole, inferior human beings by the most meaningful indices of personal worth—they are, as Michael Weisskopf alleged in his infamous 1993 Washington Post story, "largely poor, uneducated and easy to command."
This observation, now more often insinuated than so flatly stated, is not uncommon. Fear not—the journalistic mandarins assure readers who may hesitate before the idea that religious traditionalists might be right about perversion and all that—superior people like us agree against the inferior sort that this is progress, and not "going bad."
These assurances are, I think, bait to which orthodox Christians . . . should not rise. The principal reason is that early on, no less than an Apostle pointed out that across-the-board averageness was the normal condition of the Church. . . .
It's a good time, I think, to add a postscript.
One of the songs in Rodgers and Hammerstein's South Pacific includes the verse, "You've got to be taught to be afraid of people whose eyes are oddly made, and people whose skin is a diff'rent shade—you've got to be carefully taught." That is an important observation: racial prejudice is a second-level cognitive phenomenon. Small children make no race-based judgments on personal worth. People of different shapes and colors are part of the natural world, over which they have no control and therefore accept. When, upon exposure to such people, the child finds them human (that is, like me), that is all that is required to approach them with equanimity. The children of slaves and their owners played together on the plantations until the necessary "teaching" came into force.
Liberalism is also, like racism, a second-level phenomenon, whereas essential conservatism is not. The liberal has reason to believe himself intellectually superior to the conservative, reason to sneer and strut, if he feels so inclined, because he in fact does know—to be what he is, must know—more than the plain man, the natural conservative. He has learned something the conservative has not, for the conservative has not had to overcome the naturalness of first-level human associations by ideological indoctrination.
The conservative typically and naturally believes in God, but the liberal has been trained in reasons not to, and his society discourages any regression into the primitive temptation to speak into the heavens as though there were a Father there, or to see belief in God as a natural situation rather than the creation of the priests.
The liberal believes debt is the pathway to national prosperity; "gender" overrules sex and is a matter of personal choice; paternal presence and authority are not necessary for healthy family life, whereas government agency (Hillary's "village") is; and that women—smaller, weaker, slower, and the bearers of the next generation—should be put into the armed forces to fight alongside men.
These and like propositions must be taught precisely because they are unnatural. Peasant logicizing needs to be supplanted with an artificial, ideological, "educated" worldview, and above all, pride in this learning and disdain for those who don't possess it must be inculcated, not only to mock those who refuse to accept it, but also to secure the liberal in chains of madness that only an archangel could break.
S. M. Hutchens is a senior editor.
more on liberalism from the online archives
calling all readers
"There are magazines worth reading but few worth saving . . . Touchstone is just such a magazine."
—Alice von Hildebrand
"Here we do not concede one square millimeter of territory to falsehood, folly, contemporary sentimentality, or fashion. We speak the truth, and let God be our judge. . . . Touchstone is the one committedly Christian conservative journal."
—Anthony Esolen, Touchstone senior editor
• Not a subscriber or wish to renew your subscription? Subscribe to Touchstone today for full online access. Over 30 years of publishing!
Transactions will be processed on a secure server.
Order Touchstone subscriptions in bulk and save $10 per sub! Each subscription includes 6 issues of Touchstone plus full online access to touchstonemag.com—including archives, videos, and pdf downloads of recent issues for only $29.95 each! Great for churches or study groups.
OR get a subscription to Touchstone to read on your Kindle for only $1.99 per month! (This option is KINDLE ONLY and does not include either print or online.)
Your subscription goes a long way to ensure that Touchstone is able to continue its mission of publishing quality Christian articles and commentary.
more from the online archives