FSJ & Touchstone Fundraising

From the July/August, 2004 issue of Touchstone


Covenant & Remembrance by Patrick Henry Reardon

Covenant & Remembrance

Arguably the most important component of the Bible’s Flood story is the Lord’s covenant with Noah. Indeed, it is in respect to Noah that the expression “covenant” ( b’rith) first appears in Holy Scripture. This theme of covenant is found, furthermore, at both the beginning and the end of the Flood narrative in Genesis (6:18; 9:9–17).

Especially striking in this story are three resemblances between the covenant with Noah (Gen. 9) and the Bible’s second account of the covenant with Abraham (Gen. 17). First, both of these covenants are portrayed as established gifts, or endowments. Second, both of the covenants remain God’s own property. Third, each of these two covenants is marked by a specific sign, which is called “the sign of the covenant.” Let us look at these features.

First, with respect to the covenant as an established gift, or endowment, we observe that the verbs employed in each case are natan, “to give” (Gen. 9:12; 17:2), and haqim, “to establish” (9:9,11; 17:7). The first of these verbs, “give,” emphasizes the generosity of God’s act in making the covenant; it is pure, unmerited grace. The second verb, “establish,” places the accent on God’s steadfast resolve. The covenant is perpetually established; it is an “everlasting” covenant (9:16; 17:7). In the covenants with Noah and Abraham, then, there is an infallible pledge of perpetual hope.

To appreciate the significance of this perspective, it is useful to contrast these two chapters of Genesis with other covenant stories in Holy Scripture. Most of the Bible’s covenant accounts employ the Hebrew verb karath, which literally means “to cut.” Although this idiom is usually disguised in English translations (“to make a covenant”), the actual Hebrew expression says “to cut a covenant.” In context, this verb conveys the sense of an arrangement, as it were, a distribution between partners (with attention to the first syllable of that word). Even English has a similar idiom, as when we say “cut me in” to mean “make me a participant.”

That Hebrew idiom was not exclusively, nor even originally, religious. In fact, both the verb karath and the noun b’rith were commonly employed in the ancient world to designate political treaties. Examples of this usage include the treaties with Abimelech (Gen. 21:27; 26:28).

Besides that political context, “to cut a covenant” is also the expression most commonly employed in the Hebrew Scriptures to designate Israel’s several religious covenants. These include the Mosaic covenant (Ex. 34:10; Deut. 5:2), the Davidic covenant (Ps. 89:4), and the covenant renewal under Ezra (Ezra 10:3). This is also the idiom used in the Bible’s first account of the covenant with Abraham (Gen. 15:18).

The verb karath is avoided, however, in Genesis 9 and 17, where it is replaced by natan and haqim, placing a greater emphasis on the generosity and the perpetuity of God’s covenants with Noah and Abraham.

Second, in both of these accounts the covenant remains God’s own possession. This truth is conveyed in each case by the expression “ My covenant” (Gen. 9:15; 17:7). That is to say, even as the Lord “gives” and “establishes” the covenant, it still belongs to his domain and control.

Third, both covenants are marked by specific signs, each called “the sign of the covenant” ( ‘oth b’rith). In the case of Noah the “sign” is the rainbow (9:12–17), and in the case of Abraham it is circumcision (17:11).

In the covenant with Noah, moreover, it is specifically said that the function of the “sign,” the rainbow, is to cause God to “remember” his covenant (9:15–16). The covenant sign thus serves as a “memorial” (Hebrew zikkaron, Greek anamnesis), a “reminder” to God of his gracious, perpetual endowment.

Jesus likewise describes God’s definitive covenant with the Church in terms of a memorial, a reminder. “This cup,” he says, “is the new covenant in my blood. This do, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me” ( eis ten emen anamnesin—1 Cor. 11:24–25; Luke 22:19–20).

The Lord’s Supper, that is to say, is the ‘oth b’rith, the sign of the covenant, causing God himself to “remember” his gracious and perpetual endowment to the Church, his established covenant with us in Jesus. When Christians gather to “do” ( poiete) the Holy Eucharist, to break the bread and to share the cup of covenant, God gazes upon the act and he remembers. Such is the meaning of “Do this in remembrance of me.”

Patrick Henry Reardon is pastor of All Saints Antiochian Orthodox Church in Chicago, Illinois. He is the author of Christ in the Psalms, Christ in His Saints, and The Trial of Job (all from Conciliar Press). He is a senior editor of Touchstone.

Touchstone is made possible by donor support. 
Become a Friend of Touchstone today
by making a tax-deductible donation to support
its ongoing publication both online and in print!

“Covenant & Remembrance” first appeared in the July/August 2004 issue of Touchstone. If you enjoyed this article, you'll find more of the same in every issue. Support the work of Touchstone by subscribing today!

comments powered by Disqus

This page and all site content © 2017 by The Fellowship of St. James. All rights reserved. Please send comments, suggestions, and bad link reports to webmaster@touchstonemag.com.


The Still Small God

The Mustard Seed & the Wonders of His Kingdom


Doctors Delusional

Transgender Disorder & Really Bad Psychiatry


Weather or Not

On Christian Stewardship & Climate Change


Greater Than the Sum

Why the Design in Living Things Goes Far Beyond Machinery


Believe Free or Die

On Mathematical Certainty & the Liberty of Faith


ETI In the Sky

What the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligent Life Means for Us

Publisher of:

All content © The Fellowship of St. James — 2017. All rights reserved. — webmaster@touchstonemag.com.
Returns, refunds, and privacy policy.