Nightmare on Main Street: Angels, Sadomasochism and the Culture of Gothic
reviewed by Robert W. Grano
For those of us who are aficionados of the supernatural in fiction, one of the questions that constantly arises is, “Why do you read that stuff?” But a more pertinent and pressing question might be, “Why does our culture seem obsessed with that stuff?” No one who pays any attention to such things can have missed the obvious increase in interest in all things supernatural. Stephen King and Anne Rice are among our best-selling novelists; horror movies still make a mint at the box office; and there are more TV shows that deal with the uncanny than ever before. It is this cultural trend that Mark Edmundson attempts to analyze, and to offer alternatives to, in Nightmare on Main Street.
A professor of English at the University of Virginia, Edmundson describes in largely literary terms what he calls the “culture of Gothic,” a culture that is pervaded with a sense of the haunted. Noting the importance of the fact that at the end of our century, “fear constitutes one of our most common forms of entertainment,” he goes on to lament the fact that Gothic conventions are finding their way into and influencing many areas that would be considered non-fictional. Print journalism, television news, talk shows, and even modes of therapy have all been influenced by the rise of the Gothic.
What exactly does Edmundson mean by “Gothic”? He describes it as showing “the dark side, the world of cruelty, lust, perversion, and crime that, many of us at least half-believe, is hidden beneath established conventions. Gothic tears through censorship, explodes hypocrisies, to expose the world as the corrupted, reeking place it is—or so its proponents maintain.” In the realms of fiction, this is nothing particularly new. Gothic literature arose in late nineteenth-century England, partly as a reaction to the uncertainties caused by the French Revolution. It has been with us ever since in one form or another, in Poe and in Hawthorne, and in writers like Wilkie Collins and M. R. James, right up through Faulkner and Flannery O’Connor to Stephen King and Anne Rice. The problem with it today, according to Edmundson, has to do not only with its pervasiveness, but also with its extension beyond the literary into the non-fictive. He also argues that the various alternatives that have arisen to counter the rise of the Gothic, while showing at least a will to resist the trend, have been largely ineffective.
As an example of the Gothic mode seeping into everyday life, he cites the media’s handling of the O. J. Simpson case. This was a full-blown Gothic melodrama spun out by the press for all it was worth, and it included two of the common features of the literary Gothic, the hero/villain and the maiden in distress. Edmundson argues that the media unwittingly played up the Gothic angle by emphasizing the dual nature of O. J. (black/white, good/evil) and the fact that Nicole was a poor helpless woman set upon by a beast, albeit a beast who didn’t appear to be one. As other examples, he puts forth the endless parade of strangeness that shows up on the TV talk shows, and the whole “recovered memory” movement, in which people are led to uncover long-suppressed memories of abuses suffered as children, in which loved and trusted adults, often fathers, are revealed as the perpetrators. These things and others, according to Edmundson, show the extent to which the Gothic spirit has intruded into real life.
And what has our culture come up with to combat this insidious invasion? Such things as pop angelology, Forrest Gump, and the “inner child” movement. Edmundson calls these well-meaning but ineffectual counters “facile transcendence.” They offer an easy, but ultimately unsuccessful, antidote for pressing Gothic fears. According to Edmundson’s understanding, the rise of such things in our culture doesn’t constitute so much a swing away from the Gothic back towards the center, as a fulfilling of the need for an occasional “vacation” from the overarching sense of unrest and hopelessness that the Gothic produces.
Edmundson goes on to argue that an unopposed Gothic trend in culture will result in sadomasochistic human relations coming to the fore, in which all human relationships will be defined in terms of power rather than love. Cynicism, another result of the presence of the Gothic, would render love untenable, because pleasure would be inconceivable outside the cycle of domination and surrender. A scary thought indeed, and Edmundson makes his point well.
Edmundson’s diagnosis seems to be fairly accurate, although the thoughtful Christian will undoubtedly have somewhat more to say on why there is an ascendancy of the Gothic. The simple and most obvious answer, but perhaps not the most helpful one, is that when God is marginalized in a culture, all sorts of weirdness will move into the center to fill the vacuum. Humans have an innate desire for something bigger and higher than themselves, and when the true object of this desire is “unavailable,” they will fill it with whatever is at hand. This argument is correct but probably doesn’t go far enough, and Edmundson’s diagnosis indirectly provides us with a more perceptive explanation of the Gothic trend. Over one hundred years ago, Dostoyevsky showed that without God, there can be no hope. It seems to me that the godlessness of our society is bearing the fruit of hopelessness to the extent that even the pop culture, especially that of the younger generation, is beginning to understand the sheer banality and absurdity of a life where there are no absolutes, even if it doesn’t understand why.
One area where this despondency is prominent is in the field of supernatural fiction. Contemporary horror writer Thomas Ligotti is adept at capturing the essence of this despair. Many of his stories communicate the feeling of absurdity and hopelessness that is a necessary outcome of a life without absolutes. Indeed, his story “Mad Night of Atonement” is one of the most powerful statements of existential nihilism I’ve ever read, and approaches Dostoyevsky’s “Grand Inquisitor” for sheer philosophical horror. The critics, too, have taken notice of this trend. In a dual review in Necrofile of Edmundson’s book and a collection of new stories called Gothic Ghosts, the reviewer, having agreed for the most part with Edmundson’s thesis, goes on to bewail some of the stories in the collection for their “thematically unwarranted negativity.” In his book, Edmundson calls this “dead-end Gothic,” a form of the Gothic in which darkness ultimately triumphs and there is no hope. “Thematically unwarranted negativity” has become commonplace in fiction and is beginning to show up on TV and in the movies as well. If you want an example, rent the movie Seven, a well-made, well-acted film with one of the darkest, most disturbing endings in mainstream cinematic history.
The dwindling influence of Christianity, in its healthier forms, on our culture is both a cause and a result of the rise of the Gothic. As the faith becomes less influential, it becomes more and more marginalized. Consider the small but telling point that in the vast majority of new vampire fiction (and there is a lot of it, most of it rubbish), the cross no longer works as a defense against the vampire. Formerly considered an anti-Christ figure, the vampire is seldom, if ever, portrayed that way nowadays. This is because, in today’s culture, to be “anti-Christ” does not necessarily signify anything inherently horrific or repellent, as it did in former times. In a certain sense, culturally speaking, there is no longer a Christ to be against.
In the last section of his book, Edmundson, having decried both the rise of the Gothic and the facile transcendence that has arisen alongside it, gives us his own program for resisting the Gothic in our culture. The two figures that he puts forth as models are Shelley and Nietzsche. Drawing on Prometheus Unbound, he maintains that Shelley was able to work through the Gothic and come out the other side, as it were, by showing that it is possible to give up the rancor of hopelessness by repudiating revenge. In Shelley’s poem, this occurs when Prometheus stops railing against Jupiter and begins to pity him. Nietzsche, Edmundson argues, takes Shelley’s theme a step further by not only rejecting revenge (to Nietzsche, the desire for revenge is simply another manifestation of our useless wish to change the past) but also willing ourselves to accept the past to the extent that we would choose to live it over and over, for eternity. For Edmundson, this “can also provide a pragmatic standard for the life to come. That is: only do it—whatever it is—if you’d be willing to do it over and over again eternally.”
While both of these models have elements of truth in them, they obviously don’t go far enough. Edmundson’s choice of two such notoriously anti-religious, and specifically anti-Christian, figures as Shelley and Nietzsche gives one pause. Does his choice of these two indicate an overt hostility to religion as a solution for the Gothic trend? It’s hard to tell. He mentions religion sporadically throughout the book, but only deals with it specifically in a brief paragraph on the final two pages, where he is nothing more than casually dismissive.
All in all, Nightmare on Main Street is an engaging, frustrating, but ultimately worthwhile read. Despite the flaws in his thesis, Edmundson at the very least gives us a starting point for discussing the darker trends in our culture. When you read it alongside other such books as E. Michael Jones’s Degenerate Moderns, Richard Weaver’s Ideas Have Consequences, and Fr. Seraphim Rose’s little book on Nihilism, the pieces all start to fall into place. One begins to realize that what our sick culture needs to combat the Gothic is neither the “facile transcendence” of Forrest Gump and Touched by an Angel nor the visionary atheism of Shelley and Nietzsche, but a healthy dose of old-fashioned asceticism.
Letters Welcome: One of the reasons Touchstone exists is to encourage conversation among Christians, so we welcome letters responding to articles or raising matters of interest to our readers. However, because the space is limited, please keep your letters under 400 words. All letters may be edited for space and clarity when necessary. email@example.com
“Mainstream Gothic” first appeared in the January/February 1999 issue of Touchstone. If you enjoyed this article, you'll find more of the same in every issue. Click here for a printer-friendly version.
An introductory subscription (six copies for one year) is only $29.95.