Friday, November 8<\/b><\/p>\n
Philippians 2.14-30: Paul now returns to the theme of Christian obedience, the very theme that had prompted him to quote the hymn recorded in 5:5-11. He wants the Philippians (\u201cTherefore\u201d) to be obedient according to the model of Christ Himself (verse 12).<\/p>\n
However, having just recalled that hymn about salvation, Paul\u2019s mind is full of this latter theme as well. In just two verses (12-13), then, he goes from speaking about obedience to speaking about salvation.<\/p>\n
In verses 12-18 we discern a ringing resemblance to the farewell discourse of Moses in Deuteronomy 31\u201432. In that passage, where Moses reprimanded the Chosen People for their disobedience, we note an emphasis on \u201crebellion\u201d (erethismon<\/i> in the Septuagint of Deuteronomy 31:27), an idea very close to Paul\u2019s warnings against \u201cpartisanship\u201d (eritheia<\/i>; cf. 1:17; 2:3).<\/p>\n
Moses feared for what those Israelites would do in his absence (for he was about to die), since they had been so consistently disobedient while he was present. Paul, by contrast, does not worry about the Philippians will do in his absence (verse 12). Moses, likewise, had called the Israelites \u201cwicked children . . . a crooked and perverse generation\u201d (Deuteronomy 32:5), whereas Paul calls the Philippians \u201cblameless and harmless children of God . . . in the midst of a crooked and perverse generation\u201d (verse 15).<\/p>\n
It is possible that Paul, as he waited in prison for a death that seemed perhaps imminent (1:20-23), perceived some parallel between himself and Moses as the latter awaited death east of the Jordan. Both were, it appeared, taking leave of the people they had pastured. Whereas Moses, however, was filled with misgivings about those whom he was leaving, Paul felt nothing but confidence in his Philippians. <\/p>\n
These latter, after all, had always been obedient (verse 12), and Paul believed that obedience was an essential component of the Christian life (cf. Romans 1:5; 6:16; 16:18; 16:19,26; 2 Corinthians 7:17; 10:5-6; 2 Thessalonians 1:8). Such obedience was a quality of Christ in the accomplishing of our redemption (verse 8).<\/p>\n
In obedience the Philippians are together to work out their salvation. The verb is plural and denotes a common effort. Clearly Paul has in mind here more than the salvation of the individual; he is concerned, rather, with the salvation of the whole congregation. This salvation is \u201cworked out\u201d in the Church, as the Church \u201cworks out\u201d its problems. This is why Paul warns the Philippians against rivalries and squabbling. Those things in which salvation consists\u2014freedom from sin and communion with God\u2014are matters of joint and shared striving.<\/p>\n
What sort of man was Timothy? Well, we know what Paul thought of him. In today\u2019s reading he tells the Macedonians, \u201cI have no one like-minded, who will sincerely care for your state\u201d (Philippians 2:20), and goes on to speak of his \u201cproven character\u201d (2:22). <\/p>\n
Indeed, Paul refers to Timothy as \u201cour brother\u201d (2 Corinthians 1:1; Colossians 1:1; 1 Thessalonians 3:2; Philemon 1), \u201cas a son with his father\u201d (Philippians 2:22), and \u201cmy beloved and faithful son in the Lord\u201d (1 Corinthians 4:17). Paul addresses him, moreover, as \u201cson Timothy\u201d (1 Timothy 1:18), \u201cTimothy, a true son in the faith\u201d (1:2), and \u201cTimothy, a beloved son\u201d (2 Timothy 1:2).<\/p>\n
Paul knew that Timothy had been raised in a devout, believing family
\n(2 Timothy 1:5), where he was trained in the Holy Scriptures (3:15).
\nStill young, Timothy had joined Paul\u2019s company during the second missionary journey (Acts 16:1\u20133) and remained with him through the ensuing years, carefully following his \u201cdoctrine, manner of life, purpose, faith, longsuffering, love, perseverance, persecutions, afflictions, which happened to me at Antioch, at Iconium, at Lystra\u201d (2 Timothy 3:10\u201311). <\/p>\n
Along the way, Paul found that he could entrust Timothy with important responsibilities in the ministry. The young man had not been a missionary even a year before Paul sent him from Athens to Thessaloniki for a needed pastoral visit (1 Thessalonians 3:1\u20135). Later, from Ephesus, Paul sent Timothy to visit the Macedonians (Acts 19:22; Philippians 2:19\u201323) and the quarrelsome, spiteful congregation at Corinth (1 Corinthians 4:17; 16:10). It was to Timothy, finally, that Paul wrote the last letter of his life, asking him to \u201cbe diligent to come to me quickly\u201d (2 Timothy 4:9).<\/p>\n
Epaphroditus is the second of Paul\u2019s companions mentioned today. A member of the parish in Philippi, he had been sent to bring assistance to Paul during the time of his imprisonment at Ephesus. Epaphroditus, however, falling sick, needed Paul to care for him. Indeed, Paul remarks, this loyal churchman had nearly died. More recently he has recovered his health, so Paul is able to share this good news with the Philippians, who had been worried by a report of the illness. It is he who will carry this epistle to Philippi, to the great joy and relief of the congregation in that city.<\/p>\n
Saturday, November 9<\/b><\/p>\n
Philippians 3.1-11: In the present section of Philippians, in fact, the reader is much reminded of the double principal theme of Galatians, salvation by faith and freedom from the works of the Mosaic Law. For example, in Paul\u2019s comments about his communion with Christ, one can hardly fail to observe the resemblance between verses 8 to 10 and Galatians 2:20.<\/p>\n
There is a difference between Philippians and Galatians in this respect, however, and the difference is this: Whereas Galatians was written for a congregation that had already begun to succumb to the teachings of the Judaizers (namely, that the Gentiles were obliged to be circumcised and to observe the Mosaic Law), in Philippians this teaching is regarded as a threat only, not an immediate and critical danger. The Judaizing errors that had already reached Galatia had not yet found their way to Philippi.<\/p>\n
Hence, there is a difference in tone between these two epistles; nor do we find in Philippians the shock and harshness of reprimand characteristic of Galatians. One thinks of Paul\u2019s \u201cfoolish Galatians\u201d (Galatians 3:1) in contrast to the Philippians, whom he calls \u201cmy brethren dearly beloved and longed for, my joy and my crown\u201d (Philippians 4:1).<\/p>\n
In discussing the Judaizers in each of these epistles, Paul waxes autobiographical, but here too there is a difference between the two works. In Galatians Paul narrates the circumstances of his conversion, particularly his relationships to the other apostles (Galatians 1:17\u20142:17), a motif rendered necessary by the way in which the Judaizers in Galatia claimed the authority of those apostles. It is not necessary for Paul to go into these particulars at Philippi, where he was the only apostle known to the congregation. Instead, Paul concentrates his biographical comments on a contrast of \u201cbefore\u201d and \u201cafter\u201d his conversion. The tone is accordingly more serene in Philippians than in Galatians, though he does use some pretty tough language to describe the Judaizers themselves (verse 2).<\/p>\n
Psalms 25 (Greek & Latin 24): This psalm begins with such a \u201clifting up\u201d of our inner being to God. It is traditionally prayed in the morning, before the beginning of the morning work. We commence our labor each day, that is to say, by raising our hearts and mind to God. If we want to \u201cpray always,\u201d as Holy Scripture tells us to do, it is important to raise our souls to God right away as we face the day\u2019s labor. Otherwise, there is great likelihood that our occupations will involve us in endless distractions that blind us to the thought of God\u2019s presence.<\/p>\n
But this is also a prayer for the Lord\u2019s guidance throughout the rest of the day: \u201cShow me Your ways, O Lord, and teach me Your paths. Lead me by Your truth.\u201d And also a prayer for deliverance during the day: \u201cMy eyes are ever turned unto the Lord, for He will snatch my feet from the snare.\u201d And for protection against the many enemies that afflict the soul: \u201cBehold how many are my enemies, and with an unjust hatred have they hated me. Guard my soul and deliver me, that I may not be put to shame, for in You have I placed my hope.\u201d<\/p>\n
If this is a good psalm with which to commence the activities of the day, nonetheless, it is also an excellent psalm with which to close them. In this respect, several lines of Psalm 25 beseech the mercy of God for those many sins and failings with which our conscience is invariably stricken as we look back over the previous activities of the day. Mindful of our numerous offenses, we pray at nightfall, \u201cRemember Your compassion, O Lord, and Your mercy, for they are eternal. Remember not the sins of my youth nor my stupidity; but remember me in Your mercy\u2014in Your compassion, O Lord.\u201d <\/p>\n
And if with such a supplication we end the day, it is with such a supplication that we should likewise finish our lives: \u201cRemember not the sins of my youth nor my stupidity.\u201d We pray to be remembered only with the divine compassion. Having no righteousness of our own.<\/p>\n
Sunday, November 10<\/b><\/p>\n
Philippians 3.12—4.7: Especially among converts from paganism (which was by and large the case at Philippi, where there was not even a synagogue), there was a great need for types and models of behavior. More than for Jews who accepted the Gospel, conversion for the gentiles was bound to entail a more radical—even dramatic—change in personal behavior. Whereas good Jews already lived lives in conformity with God\u2019s Law, especially in the areas of sex and economics, this was often not true of gentile converts (cf. 1 Corinthians 6:9-11). Hence the need for role models in this latter group.<\/p>\n
The elaboration of a Christian lifestyle, after all, cannot be accomplished from scratch. It is largely put together by the imitation of other Christians. (Indeed, it is imperative that all Christians live in such a way as to serve as models for one another. What we do as Christians we do not do for ourselves. How we speak, how we conduct ourselves, the moral choices we make \u2014 all of these things have to do with the spiritual benefit of our brothers and sisters.) Christians learn how to be Christians by observing other Christians whom they believe to be better at it.<\/p>\n
Paul especially plays this theme when writing to his converts in Macedonia (verse 17; 4:9; 1 Thessalonians 1:6-7; 2:14; 3:12; 2 Thessalonians 3:7-9), though he touches it elsewhere as well (Galatians 4:12; 1 Corinthians 4:14-16; Acts 20:18-21,31-35).<\/p>\n
Paul\u2019s exhortation that the Philippians imitate him<\/i> means more than choosing him as a model because he happens to be available. We should bear in mind that this was something Paul had taught the Philippians long before he sent them epistles (2 Thessalonians 2:17). Paul emphasized that, not only had the congregations learned from watching him, but that he had intentionally given them<\/i> an example (2 Thessalonians 2:19). His example was part of the \u201ctradition\u201d that he had bequeathed to them (2 Thessalonians 3:6).<\/p>\n
This is also the point here in Philippians. It is not that Paul happened to be a good Christian worthy of imitation. His role as a model is part of his authority. He is a \u201ctype\u201d by reason of his ministry. The congregation\u2019s imitation of him pertains to their recognition of his authority over them. The imitation is based on paternity (cf. 1 Corinthians 4:14-15). In the sense that Paul speaks of it here, Christian imitation is not simply the replication of a model; it is the enactment of obedience to a standard.<\/p>\n
From the beginning of this epistle we have suspected that there was some sort of problem at Philippi. Nothing in this epistle has indicated that the problem was doctrinal. In fact, when the Apostle condemned the heretics, there was nothing to suggest that they were Philippian<\/i> heretics. On the contrary, Paul was obliged to tell the Philippians about<\/i> those heretics (3:18).<\/p>\n
No, we have suspected that the underlying problem at Philippi, if there was a problem, had to do with what we may call \u201cconflicting personalities.\u201d This would explain Paul\u2019s emphasis on respect, humility, and mutual forbearance (2:2-4).<\/p>\n
The present chapter proves our suspicions to have been correct, because it finally identifies the two \u201cconflicting personalities\u201d as Evodia and Syntyche, Philippian women who are exhorted to settle their differences and \u201cbe of one mind in the Lord.\u201d Three things may be noted of this exhortation to Evodia and Syntyche.<\/p>\n
Even though the conflict between them apparently provided the impulse that prompted Paul to write this epistle, it is a fact that he left the matter aside until this closing chapter. To prepare for it, he laid the groundwork by asserting more general and universally applicable principles about humility, obedience, and mutual service, such as we have seen. That is to say, Paul did not speak to the particular problem directly until he established the basis on which it could be addressed and settled.<\/p>\n
Monday, November 11<\/b><\/p>\n
Philippians 4.8-23: Right from the beginning Paul had experienced the generosity of the Macedonian Christians (verses 15-16; 2 Corinthians 8:1-5), and now once again, a further opportunity being provided, they have not failed him (verses 10,18).<\/p>\n
For his part, Paul has learned to be content with whatever circumstances the Lord sees fit to provide for him (verses 11-12), confident that he can do all things in Christ who strengthens him (verse 13; 2 Corinthians 12:10; 2 Timothy 4:17; Acts 18:9-10). This is not self-sufficiency but an ongoing dependence on Christ, a difference that separates Christian contentment from Stoic contentment.<\/p>\n
We observe that Paul employs the language of sacrifice to describe the generous gift of the Philippians (verse 18; Ephesians 5:28; Romans 12:1).<\/p>\n
Following the doxology that could form an appropriate ending to the epistle (verse 20), there is added a series of personal salutations which we are probably correct in suspecting to have been written in Paul\u2019s own hand (verses 21-23). This interpretation corresponds to what we know to have been Paul\u2019s practice (cf. 2 Thessalonians3:17; Galatians 6:11; 1 Corinthians 16:21; Philemon 9).<\/p>\n
The reference to \u201cCaesar\u2019s house\u201d (Kaisaros oikia<\/i>\u2014verse 22) means those who work for the Roman government. (The expression \u201chouse of\u201d with the name of a king normally carries this meaning in Holy Scripture, as it does throughout the ancient literature of the Middle East.) Ephesus, as the regional capital of Asia, was the site of a great deal of Roman officialdom (Acts 19:38), and Paul\u2019s mention of \u201csaints\u201d inside it shows that some Christians were already finding their place in the Roman government. This is ironical, of course, for this was the same government that was keeping Paul imprisoned. Indeed, it may have been Paul\u2019s own example that led to the conversion of these people (1:13).<\/p>\n
Psalm 29 (Greek & Latin 28): The setting of this tempest is a giant cedar forest, whose overarching branches assume the contours of a vaulted temple, and through this lofty sylvan shrine the booming voice of God comes pounding and roaring with a terrifying majesty, accompanied by the swishing of the wind and rain, while flashing bolts of lightning split the very trunks of the towering trees: \u201cIn His temple everything speaks glory.\u201d <\/p>\n
This is a psalm about God\u2019s \u201cglory\u201d (kavod<\/i> ) and \u201choliness\u201d (with a couple of plays on the corresponding Hebrew root qodesh<\/i>—note, for instance, the \u201cwilderness of This is a very active piece of poetry. After calling on the sons of God to bring Him glory and honor, the psalmist begins to describe that glory as it is revealed in the storm. Calling all God\u2019s sons to \u201cgive glory to His name,\u201d the psalmist immediately speaks of \u201cthe voice of the Lord upon the waters. The God of glory thunders.\u201d This is the same thunderous voice that in the Gospel of John tells of the glory of God\u2019s name: \u201c\u2018Father, glorify Your name.\u2019 Then a voice came from heaven, saying, \u2018I have both glorified it and will glorify it again.\u2019 Therefore the people who stood by and heard it said that it had thundered\u201d (John 12:28, 29).<\/p>\n Tuesday, November 12<\/b><\/p>\n Luke 19:11-27: This parable, partly matched in Matthew 25:14-27, is more complex than its counterpart and more allegorical. It contains not only the theme of divine stewardship but also that of obtaining a kingdom. <\/p>\n The central figure in this parable in Luke is a man who makes a distant trip to procure a royal title. In its theological sense the story symbolizes the departure of Christ to heaven, whence He will someday return with this kingly title to assess the stewardship of His servants on earth. That is to say, \u201cHe will come again in glory to judge.\u201d<\/p>\n Among the other allegorical elements in the account we note the future king\u2019s rejection by his own people, along with his eventual rejection and punishment of them.<\/p>\n Many readers of this parable have observed that its details are strangely parallel to things that actually transpired in the career of Archelaus, the son of Herod the Great. At the death of the latter in 4 B.C., Archelaus journeyed to Rome to plead for the title and authority of his father from Caesar Augustus. A delegation of Jews also went to Rome for the purpose of making the opposite request (Josephus, Antiquities<\/b> 17.11.1. \u00a7299-302).<\/p>\n It is difficult to assess the value of these interesting parallels. One is at least justified in pointing out, nonetheless, that whereas in the Lukan parable the man\u2019s enemies fail to prevent his obtaining the kingdom, in the case of Archelaus the enemies were somewhat more successful. In this latter case Rome declined to give Archelaus the title of king. He was given authority as \u201ctetrarch\u201d (\u201cone-quarter-king\u201d) over Judea and Samaria (cf. Matthew 2:22), from which position he was deposed ten years later.<\/p>\n 2 John 1-13: The writer\u2019s self-identification here is simply \u201cthe old man\u201d (ho presbyteros<\/i>. Apparently the Apostles were sometimes referred to by the generic \u201celder,\u201d or in Greek presbyteros<\/i>. This would explain why the Apostle Peter calls himself by this term (1 Peter 5:1). In the case of the present epistle, however, something more seems to be intended. The author does not call himself an<\/i> elder, but the<\/i> elder, or perhaps even \u201cthe<\/i> Elder,\u201d indicating that this is what he was called; it was the normal way in which folks referred to him, knowing exactly who was meant. <\/p>\n Abundant anecdotal evidence testifies that there have been many Christian pastors, over the centuries, who have been similarly referenced, such as the Pastor<\/i>. The present writer knows of a cathedral where the expression the<\/i> Dean referred to a clergyman who had been dead for years. None of his less impressive successors, all of them deans, were ever so called! <\/p>\n Anyway, Papias of Hieraopolis, an early second century Christian writing in Asia Minor, refers to someone called ho presbyeros Ioannes<\/i>, \u201cJohn the Elder.\u201d Although Eusebius of Caesarea, who records this witness, doubts that the reference is to St. John the Apostle (Ecclesiastical History 3.39.5-6), the present writer does not trust him on the point. Since the earliest collectors of the writings contained in the New Testament were guided by the canon of \u201capostolicity,\u201d it is difficult to understand how they would have included the present epistle, unless they had been persuaded that John the Apostle wrote it. <\/p>\n Wednesday, November 13<\/b><\/p>\n Luke 18:28-48: The journey motif in Luke now arrives at its climax. Jesus enters Jerusalem, towards which His whole ministry, as narrated by Luke, has been tending by providential necessity. <\/p>\n Luke\u2019s story is dominated by the image of Jerusalem. It begins (1:9) and ends (24:52-53) and ends in Jerusalem (a feature that explains why Luke includes no appearances of the risen Jesus in Galilee, which are mentioned in all three of the other Gospels). Jesus has now arrived in that city where human redemption will be accomplished, the \u201credemption in Jerusalem\u201d (2:38).<\/p>\n Jesus approaches Jerusalem from the east, from the Mount of Olives (verse 29). This is the mountain on which He will soon be tried in the garden(22:39) and from which He will, at the end of Luke, ascend into heaven (24:50). The climax of the Lukan journey motif, then, comes on a mountain. <\/p>\n At Bethany (from which He is pictured both as going into Jerusalem and going into heaven), which is on the east side of the Mount of Olives, Jesus is about two miles east of Jerusalem. The village of Bethphage is closer to the top of the Mount of Olives, 2673 feet above sea level. The chant with which He is accompanied (verse 38) comes from Psalm 118 (Greek and Latin 117), the last of the Hallel Psalms (113-118 [112-117]), which will soon be chanted in full near the end of the Passover Seder. Perhaps in consideration of his Gentile readers, Luke omits the word Hebrew word \u201cHosanna.\u201d<\/p>\n Revelation 1:1-8: From the start this most interesting book describes itself as a written prophecy (verse 3; cf. 19:10; 22:7,10,18,19). <\/p>\n In the early Church prophetic utterance played a major role in the determination of practical matters, such as the proper direction to be taken by missionaries (Acts 16:6-7) and the choice of men to be ordained (1 Timothy 4:14). Indeed, the prophets in the New Testament are mentioned with the apostles (1 Corinthians 12:27-29; 14:1-5; Ephesians 2:20), and we even know the names of some of them (Acts 11:27-30; 15:32). The present book contains seven references to these prophets (10:7; 11:8; 16:6; 18:2024; 22:6,9). <\/p>\n The author is John the Apostle, identical to the author of the Fourth Gospel and three New Testament epistles. If the John identified here was not that man, this enigmatic book would never have been included in the apostolic canon. The Church Fathers who determined these matters were very strict on the point.<\/p>\n The book itself is addressed to seven particular churches found in Asia Minor. It contains visions, that is, “all things that he saw,” an expression found fifty-four times in this book. Nonetheless, Revelation begins like an epistle, “grace to you and peace,” exactly like the epistles of Paul.<\/p>\n Thursday, November 14<\/b><\/p>\n Luke 20:1-8: Jesus, upon entering Jerusalem, immediately began to behave as though the place belonged to Him. Right after his triumphal entry into the city with the acclamations of the crowd, he proceeded to purge the Temple and then curse the fig tree. All of this was an exercise of \u201cauthority\u201d (exsousia<\/i>). <\/p>\n His enemies, who have already shown themselves nervous about these events, now approach Him in the Temple to challenge this \u201cauthority\u201d implicitly claimed in what has happened. The reader already knows, of course, the source of Jesus\u2019 authority, so the Gospel writers do not tell this story in order to inform the reader on this point. The story is told to show, rather, the Lord\u2019s complete control of the situation, especially His deft discomfiting of these hypocritical enemies. We earlier considered the Lord\u2019s reference to this hypocrisy with respect to their relations to both Himself and John the Baptist.<\/p>\n Revelation 1:9-20: John\u2019s vision comes “on the Lord\u2019s Day” (verse 10), Sunday (1 Corinthians 16:2), the very day when the seven churches of Asia Minor were celebrating the Lord\u2019s Supper, “the breaking of the Bread.” This service of worship normally began on the night when the Sabbath came to a close and Sunday began; it lasted through the night and ended on Sunday morning (Acts 20:7,11). <\/p>\n John describes himself as being “in the Spirit,” a technical term referring to prophetic inspiration (Numbers 11:25; 2 Samuel 23:2; Ezekiel 2:2; 3:24; Matthew 22:43). Like Ezekiel, John “fell as one dead” (verse 17), a description of the biblical phenomenon known as being “slain in the Spirit.” Such was John\u2019s response to this inaugural vision (comparable to the inaugural visions of Isaiah and Ezekiel) of Christ in glory, standing in the midst of the Menorah (verse 12), clothed as the High Priest (verse 13; Exodus 28:4; 39:29; Sirach 50:5-12). The versatile “right hand” of the Lord can simultaneously hold the Pleiades (verse 16) and still be laid gently on the downfallen John (verse 17). <\/p>\n In this vision Christ is otherwise frightening, with His white hair (verse 14; Daniel 7:9), the sword of the Word issuing from His mouth (verse 16; cf. 2:12,16; 19:15; Ephesians 6:17; Hebrews 4:12), His feet like refined brass (verse 15; Ezekiel 1:7). Here He is twice called “the First and the Last” (verses 11,17), an expression that will also appear in 2:8 and 22:13. Drawn from the Book of Isaiah (41:44; 44:6), this expression corresponds to “Alpha and Omega” (verses 8,11), the first and final letters of the Greek alphabet. Christ is, then, the beginning and end of language, the defining content of all intelligible meaning. He is, in short, the Word. He died and rose again and lives forever (verse 18; Romans 6:9). Hence, He holds the keys of death and the underworld (verse 18; cf. 9:1; 20:1).<\/p>\n Friday, November 15<\/b><\/p>\n Luke 20:20-26: The payment of the head tax to the Roman government was a source of resentment and occasional rebellion among the Jews, both because it was a sign of their subjection to Rome and because they disliked handling the graven image of the emperor on the coin. To this question, then, either a yes or a no answer could provide the basis for a political accusation against Jesus—or at least could gain Him new enemies. If Jesus forbade the paying of this tax, He would offend the Herodians. If He approved of it, He would further offend the Pharisees. Either way, He would give offense.<\/p>\n The Lord\u2019s enemies commence with manifest flattery, evidently to put Jesus off His guard before springing their loaded question (verse 16). All three Synoptics mention this detail.<\/p>\n Reading their hearts and reprimanding their hypocrisy, the Lord obliges them to produce the coin in question, thereby making it clear that they all do, in fact, have the coin and do pay the tax. <\/p>\n That point established, He then obliges them to identify the head and name on the coin, namely, Tiberius Caesar (A.D. 14-37). Obviously, the coin belongs to the emperor, so they can continue doing what they have always done\u2014pay the tax. Caesar minted and distributed the coin. It is his.<\/p>\n The concern of Jesus is not identical with that of His enemies. He is not concerned about what is owed to Caesar, but what is owed to God<\/i>. This, too, must be paid, and Jesus is about to pay it. \u201cRendering unto God the things of God\u201d refers to our Lord\u2019s approaching sufferings and death. Thus, what began as a mundane political question is transformed into a theological matter of great moment, leaving them all amazed.<\/p>\n It is important, however, to keep this story in the context where the Gospels place it, the context of the Lord\u2019s impending death. The question posed to Jesus is not a theoretical question. Indeed, it is not even a practical question. It is a loaded question—a question with an evil ulterior motive. It is a sword aimed at the Lord\u2019s life.<\/p>\n And this is the sense in which we should understand Jesus\u2019 response. Understood in this way, the Lord\u2019s directive is full of irony. He tells His enemies to give back to God that which belongs to Him. And, in context, just what is that? It is Jesus Himself, whose life they will steal, and in their act of murder that which belongs to God will be rendered unto God.<\/p>\n Revelation 2:1-7: Among the early Christian churches, that of Ephesus was particularly renowned for the strictness of its doctrinal purity. This was a book-burning congregation (Acts 19:19), which brooked no heresy. The apostle Paul, who had labored at Ephesus for three years, stressed the importance of doctrinal orthodoxy to all who ministered and taught there (Acts 20:29-31; 1 Timothy 1:3-7,18-20; 4:1-3; 5:17; 6:3-5,20; 2 Timothy 1:13-15; 2:14-18; 3:13; 4:2-5). In contrast to all of Paul-s other epistles, he mentioned no heresies in his Epistle to the Ephesians. Well into the second century, we know the reputation of the church at Ephesus for its doctrinal purity (cf. Ignatius of Antioch, Ephesians<\/i> 6,2; 9.1; Irenaeus of Lyons, Against the Heresies<\/i> 1.26.3). <\/p>\n Here in Revelation 2 the church at Ephesus is commended for dealing with certain heretics called the Nicolaitans (verse 6), who apparently taught sexual immorality (2:14-15). The church was also obliged to deal with false apostles (verse 2), concerning whom the apostle Paul had earlier given warning to the elders of Ephesus (Acts 20:29; cf. 2 Corinthians 11:13-15; Didache 11). <\/p>\n The problem at Ephesus, then, was not a lack of orthodoxy, but a lack of charity; they had forgotten their first agape<\/i> (verse 4). At one time they had known fervent love (Acts 20:36-38), but now it had grown cold. John\u2019s words to them here stand forever as a warning to those whose zeal for doctrinal purity obscures in their minds the need for true charity. Even though the Ephesian Christians are here commended for their “works,” labor,” and “patience” (verse 2; cf. exactly these three words in 1 Thessalonians 1:3), they have somehow fallen away from their “first works” (verse 5), as they have from their “first love.” <\/p>\n The paradisiacal imagery of verse 7 comes from Genesis, of course, and will appear again in the final chapter of Revelation. The first of these seven letters to the Asian churches, then, makes it clear that the most serious dangers facing those churches did not come from external threat and persecution, but from spiritual problems within. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Friday, November 8 Philippians 2.14-30: Paul now returns to the theme of Christian obedience, the very theme that had prompted him to quote the hymn recorded in 5:5-11. He wants the Philippians (\u201cTherefore\u201d) to be obedient according to the model of Christ Himself (verse 12). However, having just recalled that hymn about salvation, Paul\u2019s mind … Continue reading November 8 – November 15, 2024<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.touchstonemag.com\/daily_reflections\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2554"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.touchstonemag.com\/daily_reflections\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.touchstonemag.com\/daily_reflections\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.touchstonemag.com\/daily_reflections\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.touchstonemag.com\/daily_reflections\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2554"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.touchstonemag.com\/daily_reflections\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2554\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2555,"href":"https:\/\/www.touchstonemag.com\/daily_reflections\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2554\/revisions\/2555"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.touchstonemag.com\/daily_reflections\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2554"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.touchstonemag.com\/daily_reflections\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2554"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.touchstonemag.com\/daily_reflections\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2554"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nThe Lord chooses a donkey, not a destrier, for His entry into the Holy City (verse 30), signifying that He comes peacefully, not as a conqueror (cf. Genesis 49:11; 1 Kings 1:38; Zechariah 9:9). He is, after all, the rightful king of this city.<\/p>\n