Touchstone Magazine Home
Touchstone's Editors on news & events of the day.with Patrick Henry ReardonOrder our publications...Speakers bureau, Chicago Lecture Series, and more...Browse back issues...All the information you need

Exclusively published to the Touchstone website each week, these Daily Reflections are brief commentaries on the lectionary readings contained in the St. James Daily Devotional Guide. The reflections are penned by Patrick Henry Reardon, editor of the Daily Devotional Guide and a senior editor of Touchstone. Father Reardon provides here a very brief directional clue for one of the texts each day. Long-time readers of the Daily Devotional Guide will find these reflections an additional help to their reading of Holy Scripture which they can print and keep with their Guide.

The Daily Reflections will be updated weekly.



Sunday, December 29

The Feast of St. Thomas Becket: Today is sacred to the
memory of the Archbishop of Canterbury killed by the henchmen of King Henry
II of England in 1170. Throughout the late Middle Ages and until it was
destroyed by King Henry VIII in the 16th century, Becket's tomb was one of
the most revered shrines in Christendom and the site of many healings and
other miracles. Indeed, the many pilgrims who rode to Canterbury on
horseback adopted a pace that came to be called the "canter," and one such
group of pilgrims was immortalized in Chaucer's Canterbury Tales.
Becket himself, who eventually gave his life on behalf of the freedom of
the church from state interference, had originally been picked as archbishop
by Henry because the latter believed that he would be docile to royal
control. There was every reason to believe that such would be the case.
Becket had been a worldly man, much given to fine clothes and frequent
partying, and showing very little interested in the church or any other
godly concerns. Upon his becoming archbishop, however, his Christian
conversion was quick, deep and dramatic.
Becket has now once again become famous through various books, plays and
movies. Perhaps no one has better expressed the spirit of Becket than T. S.
Eliot in his play Murder in the Cathedral, where he puts the following lines
on the martyr's lips just before he dies:
It is the just man who
Like a bold lion, should be without fear.
I am here.
No traitor to the King. I am a priest,
A Christian, saved by the blood of Christ,
Ready to suffer with my blood.
This is the sign of the Church always,
The sign of blood. Blood for blood.
His blood given to buy my life,
My blood given to pay for His death,
My death for His death.

Monday, December 30

Psalm 21 (Greek and Latin 20): The voice of this psalm
is voice of the Church herself, glorifying the Father for the Son's victory
over sin, death, and hell. The proper sense of this psalm may be summarized
as: "Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed
us with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places in Christ. . . . In
Him we have redemption through His blood, the forgiveness of our sins,
according to the riches of His grace" (Ephesians 1:3,7).
The psalm begins then, "O Lord, the King will rejoice in Your strength, and
greatly will He exult in Your salvation." This is the rejoicing of "Jesus,
the author and perfecter of our faith, who for the joy that was set before
Him endured the cross, despising the shame, and has sat down at the right
hand of the throne of God" (Hebrews 12:2). The paschal victory is God's
response to Christ's own prayer: "You have given Him His heart's desire, nor
have You denied Him the request of His lips." The Gospels themselves suggest
that the passing hours of our Lord's suffering were a period of His intense
prayer, indicated by His several audible prayers that were recorded during
that time (cf. Matthew 26:39,42,44; 27:46; Luke 23:34,46). With respect to
this prayer of Jesus during His sufferings we are told that "He was heard
for His reverence" (Hebrews 5:8).
And for what did Jesus pray during His Passion? "He asked life of You,"
answers our psalm. And what sort of life? The mere survival of his earthly
body? Hardly. The object of Jesus' prayer was, rather, the total life that
stands forever victorious over death, the irruption of the divine life into
the world by reason of His own passage through death to glory. The true
eternal life is not a simple continuation of man's earthly existence. It is
something new altogether: "He asked life of You, and You gave Him length of
days unto ages of ages." This is the divine life given in the resurrection,
of which Jesus said: "Amen, I say to you, the hour is coming and now is,
when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God; and those who hear will
live. For as the Father has life in Himself, so He has granted the Son to
have life in Himself" (John 5:25f). This eternal life is joy forever in
God's presence, "whither the Forerunner is for us entered" (Hebrews 6:20):
"Great is His glory in Your salvation; You will bestow glory and majesty
upon Him. Blessing will You give Him forever and ever; You will gladden Him
with joy in Your presence."
By reason of His resurrection, says this psalm, Jesus reigns as King, the
very title that Pilate, in God's providential irony, affixed to the cross
itself: "O Lord, the King will rejoice in Your strength." And because He is
King, He is crowned: "For You have poured upon Him the blessings of
goodness. A crown of precious stones have You placed upon His head." Once
again, this was the glorification for which Jesus prayed as He commenced the
unfolding of His Passion: "Father, the hour has come. Glorify Your Son, that
Your Son also may glorify You. . . . And now, Father, glorify Me together
with Yourself, with the glory which I had with You before the world began"
(John 17:1,5).
Many lines of this psalm, pretty much its entire second half, are devoted to
the enemies of Christ, who are enemies of Christ precisely because they are
the enemies of man. That enemy called sin, overcome by the atoning grace of
His blood. That enemy called death, which He trampled down by His own death.
That enemy called hell, which found itself unable to hold the Author of
life. Psalm 21 thus celebrates the victory of Him who proclaims: "Do not be
afraid. I am the first and the last. I am He who lives, and was dead, and
behold I am alive for evermore. Amen. And I have the keys of hell and of
death" (Revelation 1:17-8).

Tuesday, December 31

Psalm 90 (Greek and Latin 89): One recalls Isaac
Watts's paraphrase of this psalm: "O God, our help in ages past,/ our hope
for years to come,/ our shelter from the stormy blast, and our eternal
home./ . . . Before the hills in order stood,/ or earth received her frame;/
From everlasting Thou art God,/ to endless years the same."
God is eternal, but man is frail. Even as we go forth to our daily labor,
we know that work is now onerous because we are fallen creatures. Even as we
endeavor to labor in such a way as to manifest the glory of God, the
difficulty of the work itself, along with the weariness that attends it,
bears witness to the Fall of our first parents and the curse laid upon our
race - that we labor until we die: "Cursed is the ground for your sake; in
toil you shall eat of it all the days of your life. . . . In the sweat of
your face you shall eat bread till you return to the ground from which you
were taken." Psalm 90 likewise gives voice to the sentiments of a folk thus
cursed: "You turn man to destruction, and say: 'Return, O children of men.'
. . . You carry them away like a flood, like a dream. In the morning they
are like grass that grows up; in the morning it thrives and flourishes, but
in the evening it is cut down and withers."
The flow of the years, the passage of days into nights, conducts us all
to death. Even as we go forth to our labor at the beginning of the day, it
is without guarantee of returning home at its end: "For we have been
consumed by Your anger, and by Your wrath we are terrified. You have set our
iniquities before You, our secret sins in the light of Your countenance. For
all our days are passed away in Your wrath; we finish our years like a
sigh." Once again, Isaac Watts paraphrased our psalm: "Time, like an
ever-rolling stream,/ bears all its sons away;/ they fly, forgotten, as a
dream/ dies at the opening day."
The eternal God, however, is outside of time, abiding beyond the
vicissitudes of this earth. To Him the passage of time seems no more than an
instant: "For a thousand years in Your sight are like yesterday when it is
past, and like a watch in the night." Watts translated this line in the
stanza that reads: "A thousand ages in Thy sight/ are like an evening gone,/
short as the watch that ends the night,/ before the rising sun."
Second Peter 3:8 quotes this same line of our psalm to remind Christians
that God is not subject to our own sense of time: "But, beloved, do not
forget this one thing, that with the Lord one day is as a thousand years,
and a thousand years as one day."
God's treasure here below is borne in vessels of clay, for of the mire He
made us to be the very bearers of His glory. Because we are also creatures
of the Fall, our own tilling of the soil that is to say, our labor to
support our lives in this world is infected with the forces of death. At
the same time, by reason of our incorporation into Christ, our daily labor
may also share in the first fruits of redemption, our glorification as God's
children. Our daily work, done for the sake of His glory, may become the
medium by which that glory is rendered manifest. Such are the proper
sentiments with which to close out the year that is passing into history
this evening.

Wednesday, January 1

Genesis 1: There is considerable advantage in reading
the opening chapters of Genesis right after reading the final chapters of
Revelation. Genesis was perhaps not the first book of the Bible to be
written, and it is likely that Revelation was not the last book of the Bible
to be written. Nonetheless, because the Holy Spirit is ultimately the Author
of both books, and inasmuch as the Holy Spirit planned the entire corpus of
Holy Scripture (which means that even the Bible's "table of contents" is
divinely inspired!), it should not surprise us that the final pages of the
Bible close with reflections on matters that were originally introduced in
the opening pages of the Bible. When Revelation, then, says that "there be
no more curse" (22:3), this is a reference to that primeval curse brought on
our race near the Bible's very beginning.
This opening chapter of Genesis has always been a favorite for Christian
commentators down through the ages, and they discovered in its lines
profound levels of meaning. In this respect it is worth remarking that
ancient Christian writers would have been very surprised to hear of the more
modern idea that the "seven days" of Creation were, each of them, periods of
twenty-four hours. They would have asked, in this respect, exactly what any
strict adherence to logic would require us to ask, namely, "How could that
be, since there was no way yet to measure time?" That is to say, a
twenty-four hour day requires the rotation of the earth with respect to the
sun. The sun, however, was not created until the fourth day.
Indeed, this is partly the point. The setting and rising of the sun are
not what determine day and night. We moderns think of the sunlight as that
which creates the day, and the absence of sunlight as that which creates
night. The Bible and its ancient commentators would have thought this a very
shallow notion of day and night, light and darkness. In biblical thought,
the sun "marks" the day; it does not create it. The day would be here, so to
speak, whether the sun rose or not. The purpose of the sun is to enable us
see that it is day. Evening and morning, however, already existed for three
days before there ever was a sun.
Day and night are simply the names of light and darkness (verse 5); light
and darkness exist independent of the sun or any other heavenly body. We
note that Genesis does not say that God creates darkness; darkness was, so
to speak, already there. Darkness is nothingness; it is non-existence.
Therefore night itself is symbolic of non-existence. This is why night will
eventually disappear (Revelation 22:5).
Light, on the other hand, is the first creation of God; "Let there be light"
are His first recorded words (verse 3). The light, then, and the darkness,
which are called day and night, refer to something far deeper in Creation
than the phenomena that our eyes behold. Light is not simply a by-product of
solar energy. It is, rather, the principle of intelligibility in the
structure of Creation. The light that God calls into being at the beginning
of Genesis is that inner structure of intelligibility that the mind of man,
in due course, will be created to discover and investigate. Man's
investigation of the light is called philosophy, just as his investigation
of God's Word is called theology.
In the biblical narrative of the creation, it is noteworthy that the
original day of creation is not designated "the first" day. It is called,
rather, "one day" (yom ?ehad). Although this difference of expression in
Genesis 1:5 has proved too subtle for virtually all biblical translations
into modern languages, its significance caused it to be maintained in the
ancient versions, such as the Septuagint (hemera mia) and the Vulgate (dies
unus). In addition, that difference of expression ("one day" instead of
"first day") was the object of explicit discussion in nearly all ancient
commentaries on Genesis 1:5, whether Jewish (e.g., Philo and Rashi) or
Christian (e.g., Basil and Augustine). Alas, the difference seems
excessively subtle to modern minds who come to the first chapter of Genesis
as though it were a text of astrophysics.
In those ancient and classical commentaries on this biblical text, moreover,
we find the common assertion that the words "one day" served to elevate
that day of Creation to something more than part of a sequence. There is a
profound reason why the original day of creation is appropriately called
"one," whereas the second day is not appropriately called "two," nor the
third day "three," and so forth. The original day is "one" in a manner
analogous to the number itself. "One" is not simply the numeral that
precedes two; it is, rather, the number out of which that second number
comes. There is a formal disparity between one and the other numbers. One
(to hen) is the font determining the identity of two and the subsequent
numbers. "One" is not just "first" as part of a sequence; it is what we call
a principle, an arche. On "day one," then, God creates light, which He
thereby separates from darkness. It is out of this light, which is the
product of God's first creating word, that all the rest of Creation comes.
All things that God makes are filled with His light. God's light lies
shining at the heart of the world.

Thursday, January 2

Genesis 2: (The following comments presuppose a reading
of the notes on pages 33-34 of the current edition of The St. James Daily
Devotional Guide.) To even the simplest reader of the Bible it is obvious
that there are two accounts of Creation in the first two chapters of
Genesis. Both of them are theological interpretations of the fact of
Creation; more to the point, they are different theological interpretations,
analogous to the differences we find among the four canonical Gospels.
Genesis 1 deals with Creation from nothingness; that is to say, there is no
pre-existent matter out of which God creates. The Hebrew word used to
designate this Creation is barah. By spreading Creation over six days,
followed by the Sabbath rest, the inspired author structures the Jewish week
into the structure of time itself. He views man as the final product and
pinnacle of Creation.
In this second account of Creation, in Chapter Two, everything takes place
much faster. Although man is said to sleep, night is never mentioned. Here
God is said to "form" (yasar), to give shape to; it is the word normally
used for working in ceramics. Indeed, man is shaped from the moist soil, the
mud, like the work of pottery to which Jeremiah will later compare him. In
this chapter of Genesis the plants and animals are not created until after
the creation of man. Man is created in order to take care of the plants
(verse 7-15), while the animals are created to be man's companions (verses
18-20). The very word for "man" is the Hebrew generic word for a human
being, adam, related to the adamah, or the "soil" from which he comes.
Still, this first human being is a male. (The word for "human being" in all
languages, by the way, is unvaryingly masculine; for example, ha'adam in
Hebrew, ho anthropos in Greek, 'nsh' in Syriac, al-insan in Arabic,
chelovyek in Russian, der Mensch in German, de man in Dutch, zmogs in
Lithuanian, man in English, homo in Latin, along with its multiple
derivatives in Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, Romanian, and French. And so
forth. These are all masculine nouns. Contrary to the contemporary conceit
that pretends otherwise, there is no such thing as a non-gendered, a
gender-neutral noun for a human being. While the sex of an actual human
being is either male or female, the gender of the designating noun is
invariably masculine. This distinction, alas, tends to be lost on those who,
confusing grammar with biology, confuse gender with sex.)
It is from this first man, Adam, that the first woman is formed. More
specifically, it is from the part of man closest to his heart, from the
place where woman herself lives, at man's side. But she comes from within
him; when Adam sees her, he recognizes this "bone of my bone and flesh of my
flesh." She is, as it were, part of him. The sexual attraction between men
and women, in the eyes of the Bible, is metaphysical, having to do with an
essential craving for inner wholeness (verse 24). Jesus will later on appeal
to this truth as the basis for His prohibition of divorce (Mark 10:8-9; 1
Corinthians 6:16-17; Ephesians 5:31-32). It also serves as the biblical
argument against sexual activity outside of the marriage between a man and a
woman. Any sexual activity that does not involve a man and a woman, married
to one another, stands outside of the proper moral structure of human
sexuality itself. This is one of the major applications of man's
transcendence to the animals.

Friday, January 3

Genesis 3: (The following comments presuppose a reading
of the notes on pages 34-36 of the current edition of The St. James Daily
Devotional Guide.) We notice several things about the Fall. First, Adam and
Eve become aware of themselves as naked, as exposed. They are no longer
comfortable with themselves (verse 7). They hide from God (verse 8). Then,
when God questions Adam, the latter immediately casts the blame on his wife,
and indirectly on God Himself, who gave Adam that wife (verses 11-12). Eve,
in her turn blames the snake (verse 12). God then curses all three, in
reverse order: first the snake (verses 14-15), then Eve (verse 16), and
finally Adam (verses 17-19).
Even as God drives Adam and Eve from the garden, however, He provides
better clothing for them (verse 21). This is important. Man's sin created
the problem of nakedness, and hence the solution of clothing, as described
here in Genesis 3. In the Bible's final book, nonetheless, when man's sin
has in every last sense been conquered, we do not see the human race
returned to the nakedness of its primitive, unfallen state. The new man is
Christ is clothed. We are described in the Book of Revelation as wearing the
white robes of glory. Grace, that is to say, does more than reverse the
effects of sin; it transforms the effects of sin. Our new innocence in
Christ is not to be identified as simply the earlier innocence of Adam. The
effect of sin is not merely removed; it is assumed into a more ample
transformation.
As we go on in Genesis and the rest of Holy Scripture we will meet other
examples of this mysterious transformation of certain human experiences,
especially cultural forms, that are associated in their origin, or at
least their earliest historical expression, with the Fall. That is to say,
the new life in Christ includes His taking hold of and entirely remolding
certain components of life that were not part man's original, innocent
state. Even as He vanquishes sin, God does not simply undo or reverse the
effects of man's Fall. Rather, He assumes these same effects, particularly
cultural effects, into a larger expression of man's ascent.
The human race has fallen in Chapter 3. Man is about to fall even lower in
Chapter 4.

Saturday, January 4

Genesis 4: This chapter does not tell why God favored
Abel's sacrifice, while rejecting that of Cain. For the answer to this
question we must go to Hebrews 11:4: "By faith Abel offered to God a more
excellent sacrifice than Cain, through which he obtained witness that he was
righteous, God testifying of his gifts." We also observe that this is the
first of many biblical instances where God chooses the younger son over the
elder (Isaac over Ishmael, Jacob over Esau, Joseph and David over their
older brothers, and so forth).
In verse 7 the Lord describes evil as "lying at the door" in wait for
Cain. Temptation is portrayed as lurking for a man, stalking him, and Cain
is exhorted to vigilance, lest he be taken by it. The Hebrew participle for
"lying" here, robesh, may be better translated as "crouching." It is related
to the name of a god in Assyro-Babylonian literature known as "Rabishu," who
is described as crouching along the road, endeavoring to waylay the
traveler. Cain is warned not to fool with it; it is dangerous. Cain's
mother, after all, had made the big mistake of dialoguing with the snake.
Satan, however, invariably wins over those who discuss things with him. Or,
as we read in Sirach 21:2, "Flee from sin as from the face of a serpent, for
if you come too near to it, it will bite you."
Cain pays no heed, nonetheless, and goes on to kill his brother (verses
8-10). The first sin leads to the second. The original alienation in Chapter
3 becomes the murder in Chapter 4. Jealousy and violence are the proper
products of that first act of infidelity. Cain, the first human being
begotten of human parents, is also the first murderer. This murder was not
committed in a fit of passion. Cain showed, by his response to God in verse
9, that he had closed off his heart to God. His disrespect for God was the
foundation on which his murder was based. He could not have killed unless he
had isolated himself from God. Moreover, by this murder Cain alienated
himself from the very ground on which he walked (verses 11-12). He had begun
as a farmer, but now he is alienated from the soil. He has assumed, by his
sin, the impossible task of being a wandering farmer. The foundational
reason for Cain's alienation from the earth and his fellow men is his
alienation from God (verse 16).
At this point a new element enters the scene, vengeance. Cain is afraid
of the retaliation that may be visited on his head because of his murder of
Abel (verse 14). Violence begets violence. God's reply to Cain in verse 15
is reassuring to Cain himself, but it further extends the domain of
violence. If Cain is killed, the vengeance will be seven-fold!
Then comes the building of the first city (verse 17), and it is
manifestly ironical that this first great effort at this exercise of social
cooperation was inaugurated by a murderer! What is said of clothing seems
also true of what we may call "urban life." God did not, at the beginning,
place man in a city but in a garden. The city was fallen man's idea. The
first city was founded by the first murderer. Indeed, the first city was
founded by the first fratricide, a fact that becomes the most ironical of
archetypes. The irony was certainly not lost on St. Augustine, who commented
at some length on the manifest travesty that such a great enterprise of
brotherly cooperation should be started by a man that killed his brother. In
his lengthy The City of God, the saintly bishop of Hippo went on to compare
Cain's founding of the city of Enoch to the founding of the city of Rome by
Romulus, who had killed Remus, his own brother. Man's efforts, that is to
say, are constructed with the elements of their own deterioration. Merely
human efforts only disguise man's plight for a while. The heart of all evil
is alienation from God, so any society founded on that alienation has
already drunk poison. It will surely die.
It is abundantly curious that Cain's descendents take up, among other
things, the crafting of musical instruments. This is another example of a
cultural form conceived in evil, but which God takes special care to redeem.
What we said about clothing and urban life also applies to musical
instruments. Originally crafted by a descendent of Cain, they do not look
promising at first. Moreover, there has often been something a bit
problematic about such music, morally considered. When King Nebuchadnezzar
employed "the sound of the horn, flute, harp, lyre, and psaltery, in
symphony with all kinds of music" for his idolatrous purposes, it was not
the last instance when instrumental music served to deflect men from the
worship of the true God. Yet, in fact, God rather early designated musical
instruments as appropriate to His own worship in the tabernacle and the
temple. And, once again, in the final book of the Bible we find heaven to be
a place resonating with the sounds of trumpet and harp. Moreover, as an
added irony, instrumental music is eventually limited so exclusively to the
saints in heaven that the damned in hell are forever deprived of such music!
The sinful descendents of Cain, the very inventors of harp and flute, will
never hear them again, inasmuch as the "sound of harpists, musicians,
flutists, and trumpeters shall not be heard in you anymore" (Revelation
18:22). These things are now reserved for the blessed.



Archives

 

Copyright © 2002 by the Fellowship of St. James. All rights reserved.

 


Home - Mere Comments - Daily Reflections - Store - Speakers & Conferences - Archives - Contact Us

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?