Touchstone: A Journal of Mere Christianity
“An Orthodox Appreciation of George MacDonald” first appeared in the July/August 1999 issue of Touchstone.
An Orthodox Appreciation of George MacDonald
Robert W. Grano on George MacDonald
One of the most frequent criticisms made against the work of George MacDonald (I’m speaking here primarily of the novels, not the fantasies) is that his characters are not realistic enough, that they are often too saintly or otherworldly. This aspect of his work is one that I find most appealing, and though I am a convert to the Orthodox Church from evangelical Protestantism, MacDonald is one of the few Protestant writers that I still read regularly.
An Orthodox Ideal
Why is MacDonald one of the few writers who has, so to speak, made the jump with me? Is there some affinity between MacDonald’s theology and that of Orthodoxy? Not really. To be honest, much in MacDonald’s theology, strictly speaking, an Orthodox would find suspect. His Christology could be described as foggy.
In some places, for example, he seems to imply that Christ was, even before the Incarnation, “man” in some sense. He also wasn’t as unwaveringly Trinitarian as an Orthodox would like, being somewhat sympathetic to the Unitarians of his day, even to the point of preaching to Unitarian congregations. He himself didn’t hold to their views, and was a convinced Trinitarian, but apparently he didn’t view Trinitarian doctrine as a non-negotiable, since he considered the Unitarians to be true Christians (even if he thought them wrong on this one issue).
MacDonald also had a tendency to come down hard on both doctrine and those who tenaciously held to it, though to be fair, his complaint seems to be chiefly with those who see themselves as doctrinally correct but don’t live according to what they teach. He was particularly tough on doctrinaire Christians of any stripe whom he perceived as not bearing any fruit. He did not suffer hypocrites gladly. His complaint was understandable, given the very strict hyper-Calvinism of his place and time (nineteenth-century Scotland), although sometimes he mistakenly seems to conclude that hypocrisy is a necessary corollary of having a strict doctrinal standard, something with which traditional Christians would disagree.
His oft-mentioned universalism is also a problem, but that is something that has appeared in the thought of both Eastern and Western theologians from time to time, and is borne, in most cases, out of a great love for people. Undoubtedly, this was true in MacDonald’s case, as it was for an Orthodox theologian such as St. Gregory of Nyssa. MacDonald’s beliefs are similar to his—theirs was not the modern notion that everyone will automatically be saved, but the idea that all will ultimately repent and be restored to God. Although Gregory’s universalism was rejected by the Church, he is Orthodox in his other views and is still considered a saint. Following the same type of reasoning, one can say that MacDonald’s doctrinal fuzziness does not make him heterodox through and through. But from these examples, one can see that it’s not his theology that creates an affinity with the East.
If it’s not the theology, then what is it? Well, in a nutshell, it’s the piety. In the East ethics and morals are considered largely in Platonic terms, with the notion of the “ideal” being central. Thus, the entire life of piety in the Eastern Church is based upon striving for the ideal or goal, which is to be like Christ. In this way, MacDonald’s portrayal of the Christ-life is very similar to that of the Orthodox Church.
An Orthodox believer who had never heard of MacDonald would, upon reading Sir Gibbie or Malcolm, feel he knew these characters, because he has come across similar ones in the lives of the saints. Gibbie is a completely selfless individual, constantly denying himself for the sake of others, and as such, seems to be more Christ-like than is humanly possible. In another way Malcolm, and Alister Macruadh in What’s Mine’s Mine, portray a different aspect of saintliness, that of those who constantly struggle to make the right choices no matter what the cost.
All pious Orthodox people read the lives of the saints, and in these and other characters in MacDonald’s novels they would find something very similar, a piety with the same flavor. The quest for these characteristics of goodness and saintliness isn’t limited to Eastern Christianity, obviously, but the East, having a Platonic mindset about such things, would feel a strong affinity towards MacDonald’s idealistic portrayal of sanctity.
Idealism & Sanctity
It’s also important to note that George MacDonald was first a poet; when asked by his publisher to write novels, he did so because he saw the novel as a more effective way to get his message across. MacDonald’s was an idealistic poetry: he worked to express the reality beyond the appearances, the possibilities hidden in the realities of everyday life, possibilities the average person often does not see.
He carried this poetic idealism into the novels, and being a Christian, this idealism was reflected in the exceptional saintliness of many of his characters. These characters are not cardboard saints but fully realized, three-dimensional creations. (C. S. Lewis somewhere remarked that MacDonald was one of the few writers who could make saintly characters interesting, and even before his own conversion wrote his friend Arthur Greeves that “I know nothing that gives me such a feeling of spiritual healing, of being washed, as to read G. MacDonald.”)
As a result, he does much more than simply write sermons in the form of novels, or use his fiction simply as an excuse to preach, things of which he is often accused. His approach is far richer. His characters are themselves living sermons, examples of Christ-likeness for all of his readers. They are examples by what they say, but even more so by how they live, and this latter characteristic is the chief quality of a saint.
I’ve heard that when novices go to Mt. Athos in Greece, the center of Orthodox monasticism, one of the first things they are told to read is Dickens, because they can learn from his characters how to be a good, decent person. This basic goodness is considered the first rung on the ladder toward holiness. I think something similar can be said about George MacDonald’s novels. I have made it a point to recommend him to people who are interested in the life of piety, not because I am in any position to give advice (God knows I’m not), but because I have found his works to be of great spiritual benefit. Through his characters, we can catch a glimpse of how we can be if, with God’s help, we strive for the ideal.
Readers may be interested in the quarterly publication Wingfold, devoted to the life and works of George MacDonald. Each issue contains rare material by and about MacDonald, plus contemporary articles and Victorian illustrations. One-year North American subscriptions: $20 US. Overseas subscriptions: $26 US. (Foreign currency is accepted.) Payable to Barbara Amell, 5925 S.E. 40th St., Portland, OR 97202, USA.
Robert W. Grano is a freelance writer from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. He is a regular book reviewer for All Hallows: The Journal of the Ghost Story Society. He is a convert to Eastern Orthodoxy via the Assemblies of God and the Episcopal Church.
“An Orthodox Appreciation of George MacDonald” first appeared in the July/August 1999 issue of Touchstone. If you enjoyed this article, you'll find more of the same in every issue.
Letters Welcome: One of the reasons Touchstone exists is to encourage conversation among Christians, so we welcome letters responding to articles or raising matters of interest to our readers. However, because the space is limited, please keep your letters under 400 words. All letters may be edited for space and clarity when necessary. email@example.com
This page and all site content © 2015 by The Fellowship of St. James. All rights reserved. Please send comments, suggestions, and bad link reports to firstname.lastname@example.org.